zoning

Property owner argued the school is a high-quality addition and not a rezone.

Resident argued the amendment violates city standards and creates safety risks.

A resident argued that the proposed building size is inappropriate for Neighborhood Commercial zoning and would lead to increased traffic and disruption, negatively impacting neighborhood entrances and safety. She also noted that larger buildings are not allowed in heavy commercial zoning.

A resident expressed concern that the amendment benefits an outside company and would take away opportunities for local businesses. He argued that larger developments are irresponsible given the city's logistical challenges and that the current zoning is for residents.

A resident and part-owner of the parcel at 2000 S. Ring Road expressed support for increasing building size, noting that without a rezone, the current zoning allows for much larger development than proposed by the school. He believes a recreation/event center would be a better fit than other commercial uses.

A resident raised concerns about traffic on Ring Road, particularly near a park, and questioned the necessity of a city-wide change. He noted that most online comments in favor were from out-of-town residents.

A resident shared an experience from Provo where a charter school caused significant traffic issues and blocked emergency access. She warned that similar problems could occur in Saratoga Springs, especially with drop-off/pick-up times and potential emergencies.

A resident expressed support for positive developments but opposed the proposed code change, arguing it would affect the entire city long-term. She raised concerns about increased traffic on Lariat Road and the potential for the road to become a major collector for the school.

A resident expressed support for the code change, suggesting it could be conditionally approved for school use only. She believes a school would generate less traffic and noise than other commercial businesses and would benefit local families.

A resident supported the code change, acknowledging traffic concerns but noting the developer's efforts to mitigate them. She suggested limiting the building size increase to school use only and highlighted that the proposed school development would result in more green space than other commercial options.

A resident stated he is not against charter schools but believes the proposed location is inappropriate. He emphasized that changing the zoning could open the door to other, less desirable businesses if the school does not materialize.

A resident opposed the city-wide code change, arguing that Neighborhood Commercial zones should serve immediate neighborhood needs and that allowing four times larger buildings is inappropriate. She also raised concerns about evacuation routes and traffic congestion, referencing past wildfire events.

A resident expressed concern that the developer is seeking to change the zoning parameters first, and that a school is not guaranteed. He noted that changing zoning for multiple sites could lead to unforeseen developments.